Science and Religion Overview of the SARS-Cov-2 Vaccine: A Rasch Analytical Approach

  • Albertos Damni IAIN Kerinci
  • Dinyah Rizki Yanti Zebua Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
  • Bali Yana Fitri Universitas Negeri Padang
Keywords: science, religion, vaccine, rasch

Abstract

Science and Religion are two entities that often clash. The purpose of this study is to interpret the tendencies of the students of the two entities by using the Rasch analysis approach to re-validate the previous scale. Science students are Biology Education Department and religion are Islamic Education Department. This study shows a significant difference between Science and Religion students in giving approval to the Corona-SARS-Cov-2 virus vaccine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrich, D. (2005). Rasch, Georg. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00477-1
Andrich, D. (2010). Rasch Models. International Encyclopedia of Education, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00258-X
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2013). Applying the Rasch Model. In Applying the Rasch Model. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410614575
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model. In Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences.
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rating Scale Surveys. In Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4_2
Brouwers, T. J., & Van der Zeijst, B. A. M. (2021). Vaccine Production, Safety, and Efficacy. Encyclopedia of Virology, 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814515-9.00121-1
Ecarnot, F., Maggi, S., & Michel, J. P. (2020). Vaccination (Prophylaxis) in the Elderly. Encyclopedia of Biomedical Gerontology, 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.11390-X
Engelhard, G., & Wind, S. A. (2019). Invariant Measurement with Raters and Rating Scales. In Invariant Measurement with Raters and Rating Scales. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315766829-14
Esparza, J. (2020). Early vaccine advocacy: Medals honoring Edward Jenner issued during the 19th century. Vaccine, 38(6), 1450–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VACCINE.2019.11.077
Esparza, J., & Damaso, C. R. (2022). Searching for the origin of the smallpox vaccine: Edward Jenner and his little-known horsepox hypothesis. Vaccine, 40(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VACCINE.2021.11.007
Liquin, E. G., Metz, S. E., & Lombrozo, T. (2020). Science demands explanation, religion tolerates mystery. Cognition, 204, 104398. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2020.104398
Mejia, C. R., Rodriguez-Alarcon, J. F., Ticona, D., Flores-Lovon, K., Paredes-Obando, M., Avalos-Reyes, M. S., Ccasa-Valero, L., Carbajal, M., Esteban, R. F. C., Mamani-Benito, O., Rivera-Lozada, O., & Tovani-Palone, M. R. (2021). Validation of a scale to measure the perception of sars-cov-2 vaccines acceptance: the vac-covid-19 scale. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/11012
Oberste, M. S., Burns, C. C., & Konopka-Anstadt, J. L. (2021). Polio Eradication. Encyclopedia of Virology, 310–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814515-9.00117-X
Preston, V. (2020). Questionnaire Survey. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10860-1
Pronyk, P., Sugihantono, A., Sitohang, V., Moran, T., Kadandale, S., Muller, S., Whetham, C., & Kezaala, R. (2019). Vaccine hesitancy in Indonesia. The Lancet Planetary Health, 3(3), e114–e115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30287-0
Rasinski, K. A. (2005). Surveys. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, 733–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00032-3
Rees, A. R. (2022). The scourge of smallpox: variolation, vaccination, and Edward Jenner. A New History of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812754-4.00005-4
Rutjens, B. T., & Preston, J. L. (2020). Science and religion: a rocky relationship shaped by shared psychological functions. The Science of Religion, Spirituality, and Existentialism, 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817204-9.00027-5
Schleiss, M. R. (2022). Viral Vaccines. Encyclopedia of Infection and Immunity, 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818731-9.00225-1
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (edisi revisi).
Tanur, J. M. (2015). Sample Surveys: Cognitive Aspects of Survey Design. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (Second Edi, Vol. 20). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44086-9
Wang, V. H. C., Silver, D., & Pagán, J. A. (2022). Generational differences in beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. Preventive Medicine, 157, 107005. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YPMED.2022.107005
WHO. (2009). State of the world’s vaccines and immunization. Third edition-Executive summary. World Health Organization, 12. https://www.who.int/immunization/sowvi/en/
Williams, J. T. B., Rice, J. D., & O’Leary, S. T. (2021). Associations between religion, religiosity, and parental vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine: X, 9, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVACX.2021.100121
Winter, T., Riordan, B. C., Scarf, D., & Jose, P. E. (2022). Conspiracy beliefs and distrust of science predicts reluctance of vaccine uptake of politically right-wing citizens. Vaccine, 40(12), 1896–1903. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VACCINE.2022.01.039
Wirawan, G. B. S., Mahardani, P. N. T. Y., Cahyani, M. R. K., Laksmi, N. L. P. S. P., & Januraga, P. P. (2021). Conspiracy beliefs and trust as determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Bali, Indonesia: Cross-sectional study. Personality and Individual Differences, 180, 110995. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2021.110995
Wu, W., & Little, T. D. (2011). Quantitative Research Methods. Encyclopedia of Adolescence, 1, 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373951-3.00034-X
Published
2022-04-25
How to Cite
Damni, A., Zebua, D. R. Y., & Fitri, B. Y. (2022). Science and Religion Overview of the SARS-Cov-2 Vaccine: A Rasch Analytical Approach. Symbiotic: Journal of Biological Education and Science, 3(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.32939/symbiotic.v3i1.61