Analisis Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Siswa pada Pembelajaran Biologi Ditinjau dari Prestasi Siswa Kelas VIIIA Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) Negeri 12 Sungai Penuh
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the creative thinking ability of students who are high achievers, medium achievers, low achievers at SMP Negeri 12 Sungai Penuh and to determine a comparative analysis of the creative thinking abilities of all students in biology learning at SMP Negeri 12 Sungai Penuh. This type of research is descriptive qualitative research. informants in the study were biology teachers and students at SMP Negeri 12 Sungai Penuh. The data collection techniques used were observation, interview and documentation methods. The results of the research are the creative thinking abilities of high achieving students are students who have the maximum creative thinking stage, Students who have high creative thinking abilities have better achievement and their thinking abilities follow the stages in creative thinking skills. are students who have the ability at several stages of creative thinking, but there are also some stages of creative thinking that still cannot be implemented properly and optimally. Such as the illumination stage and the verification stage. Students with low creative thinking abilities have low learning achievement. The stages carried out are still very poor at the preparation, incubation, illumination and verification stages.
Keywords: Creative Thinking, Achievement
Downloads
References
Arikunto. Suharsimi. (1997). Dasar-dasar evaluasi Pendidikan,. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Aunurrahman. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung : Alfabeta
Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. (2006). Al-qur’an dan Terjemahnya. Bandung : PT. Syaamil Cipta Media. Cetakan ke-2
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (1999). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka
Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2010). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
Herdian. Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Siswa. (artikel). diakses tanggal : 15 Oktober 2017, dalam : http/googleweblight.
Isna Nur Lailatul Fauziyah. (2013). Proses Berfikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas X dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tahapan Wallas Di tinjau dari AQ Siswa. Jurnal. FKIP UNS Jakarta
Munandar, SC. Utami. (1999). Kretaivitas dan Keberbakatan : Startegi Mewujudkan Potensi Kreatif dan Bakat. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Cet. Ke-4
Mudzakir, Ahmad, Joko Sutrisno. (1995). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Pustaka Setia
Nata, Abuddin. (1997). Filsafat Pendidikan Islam 1. Jakarta: LogosWacana Ilmu
Riyanto, Yatim. (2010). Paradigma Baru Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Kencana
Rustaman, (2003). Pokok-Pokok Pembelajaran Biologi dan Kurikulum 1994, Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Sagala, Syaiful. (2005). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. (Bandung : Alfabeta
Sardiman. (2001). Interaksi & Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Sianipar, Prowel. (2010). Mudah dan Cepat Menghapal Biologi. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Book Publisher
Soekartawi, dkk, (2003). Meningkatkan Rancangan Intruksional(Intructional design) Untuk memperoleh Kualitas Belajar Mengajar. PT. Grafindo Persada: Jakarta
Sudjadi, Bagod dan Siti Laila, (2002). BIOLOGI Sains dalam Kehidupan, Surabaya: Yudhistira
S. Winataputra, Udin. (1996). Proses Belajar mengajar Yang efektif. Jakarta: PT. Bina Karya
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia. (2003). Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Bandung : Citra Umbara
Yamin, Martinis. (2007). Profesionalisme Guru & Implementasi KTSP. Jakarta: Tim Gaung Press, Cet. Ke- 2
Zuhairini, dkk. (1996). Metodik khusus Pendidikan Agama. Surabaya: Biro Ilmiah Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Sunan Ampel Malang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.